ENGL-145 -01 Reasoning, Argumentation and Writing

Introduction

A.  official description:

1.    reasoning, argumentation and writing

2.    reasoning, rhetoric, research

B.  argumentation=persuasion--Peitho--http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/Mythology/Peitho.html

C.  Why a GE requirement?

1.    college learners pass through three stages of intellectual development before becoming sophisticated critical thinkers.

a)   Dualism. Very young or unsophisticated thinkers tend to see the world in polar terms: black and white, good and bad, and so on. These students also have what Perry calls a "cognitive egocentrism" - that is, they find it difficult to entertain points of view other than the ones they themselves embrace. If they have no strong beliefs on a topic, they tend to ally themselves absolutely to whatever authority they find appealing. At this stage in their development, students believe that there is a "right" side, and they want to be on it. They believe that their arguments are undermined by the consideration of other points of view.

b)   Relativism. As students progress in their academic careers, they come to understand that there often is no single right answer to a problem, and that some questions have no answers. Students who enter the stage of relativism are beginning to contextualize knowledge and to understand the complexities of any intellectual position. However, the phase of relativism has some pitfalls - among them that students in this phase sometimes give themselves over to a kind of skepticism. For the young relativist, if there is no Truth, then every opinion is as good as another. At its worst, relativism leads students to believe that opinion is attached to nothing but the person who has it, and that evidence, logic, and clarity have little to do with an argument's value.

c)    Reflectivism. If students are properly led through the phase of relativism, they will eventually come to see that, indeed, some opinions are better than others. They will begin to be interested in what makes one argument better than another. Is it well reasoned? Well supported? Balanced? Sufficiently complex? When students learn to evaluate others' points of view, they will begin to evaluate their own. In the end, they will be able to commit themselves to a point of view that is objective, well reasoned, sophisticated - one that, in short, meets all the requirements of an academic argument.

(1)  William Perry's Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme (1970) http://www.uoregon.edu/~tep/resources/crmodel/model/supporting_reflective_thinking.html

2.    To paraphrase Winston Churchill's evaluation of democracy as a form of government, persuasion is the worst method of social control—except for all the others.

D.  Argument based on research

1.    fact, experiment, interpretation

2.    communities of discourse, scientific, scholarly, other

3.    my use of research and creation of research—the classÕs

E. Logos, Pathos, Ethos

1. Aristotle and others

F.   Sustainability

1.    what is it—triple bottom line

2.    sustainability in education

a)   Talloires

b)   David Orr

3. The Culture of Sustainability

4. "Think Global, Write Local: Sustainability and English Composition"

G.   Course Outline